Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Public Health VS. The Medical Care System


We placed our “This is public health” sticker on the Tampa campus of Florida Hospital, one of an eight hospital system in the state of Florida. The photo shows a smoking ban on the Florida hospital campus, and was located near one of the backside entries to the hospital. We chose this location to emphasize the relationship between public health measures and the medical system. In essence, the study of public health focuses on prevention of disease and promotion of health. On the other hand, the medical system focuses on treatment of illness and disease. While public health and medical care have contrary approaches most times, both are necessary to maintain the health of a society. We must educate individuals on how to lead healthy lifestyles as well as take care of those who, for reasons, perhaps socioeconomic, financial situations, personal circumstances, were unable to and thus fall to the mercy of the medical system. The juxtaposition of those still healthy enough to prevent illness compared to those who are already ill is evident in the No-Smoking sign posted. The sign asks those healthy enough to still make their own health choices to please not smoke on the Florida Hospital campus, in order to prevent further health injury to existing hospital patients. Perhaps most interesting about the posted sign was that the campus only became tobacco free in July of 2011, a little over one year ago. This brings into question the true importance the government, and society place on public health measures. The hospital was opened in 1968, so why did it take so long to make a simple initiative to further protect the health of the hospital patients? Nuances like this make evident that despite the longer term effects of public health measures, American society still tends to adhere to the medical care system, which provides only short term benefits and equally costly, if not more, in comparison with public health measures. 

3 comments:

  1. I think it is interesting to relate this public health issues to matters we discuss in class, such as personal freedoms being taken away to benefit the whole of the population. To address the question of why this measure took so long to enact, I believe it has to do with Americans wanting to keep their individual freedom and choices regardless of possible negative outcomes. I believe it has taken years of research and thousands of cancer cases caused by tobacco to convince the population to accept a new policies of tobacco restriction.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Smoking in public places has been a controversial subject for years. Some people feel that being able to smoke is a right, and should be allowed in all public places. Others object to being exposed to second-hand smoke. After much debate, smoking is now being prohibited in many public venues. It has been decided that it is in the best interest of public health to limit exposure to individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really agree with this blog; for the simple fact, that smoking should be ban from all hospitals. Considering that patients undergo serious surgeries and due to the cancerous fumes may become a detriment to one's health and can even cause second hand smoke. Also, this should be highly encouraged because patients that are recovering from lung cancer, can be influenced to smoke again or can make them extremely sick. Eventually more hospitals will consider passing these polices in order to promote a healthier environment to public health.

    ReplyDelete